Codgitator over at Fides Cogit Actio has recently been on a language kick, specifically discussing attempts to de-bias language and science and so on via E-Prime. Interesting stuff.
See, I happen to love analyzing language, deciphering which words evoke what kinds of ideas, etc. And since I've also been thinking about Intelligent Design as of late, I wanted to share some thoughts that combine the two subjects. This time, put briefly. More of a food for thought thing.
* Is it purely scientific to refer to a mutation as an "error"?
* Is it purely scientific to refer to parts of the genome as "junk" for any reason?
No further commentary from me for now. Just something to think about.